http://www.cotidianul.ro/numarul_americanilor_care_iau_antidepresive_s_a_dublat_ajungand_la_27_de_milioane-94290.html

Posted by admin, on August 4th, 2009, at 5:44 pm. #.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/white-house-proposal-to-track-government-website-users-stirs-fears.html

Posted by admin, on August 12th, 2009, at 1:34 pm. #.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-census-gestapo.html

Posted by admin, on August 12th, 2009, at 2:41 pm. #.

http://romaniatotalitara.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/roedunet-cenzureaza-accesul-la-internet/

Posted by admin, on August 17th, 2009, at 5:42 pm. #.

“Net Neutrality” Will End Net Freedom

Rev. Ted Pike
National Prayer Network
Monday, Sept 28th, 2009

In a bold new move to establish federal censorship of the internet, Pres. Obama has directed FCC chairman Julius Genachowski to seek legislation that will forbid large internet providers such as Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T to “favor certain content or applications over others.” In other words, they cannot “discriminate” against content of which they disapprove or simply do not want to promote.

On the surface, this initiative seems to protect non-establishment views in cyberspace. In reality, it updates the devious Civil Rights Act of 1964 by stating that providers’ free enterprise businesses no longer belong to them to be operated as they see fit. Control will belong to consumers. Anyone can take advantage of the providers’ labor and investment.

Although one might question whether huge internet providers are unduly troubled by issues of conscience, nevertheless net neutrality establishes precedent that the conscience of an internet entrepreneur can be trampled and has no moral right to reject offensive content. This could include pornography, homosexuality, or political and religious ideas the entrepreneur does not want to promote. If denied service, any customer could scream “Discrimination!” promoting federal investigation and indictment.

The Obama administration thus wants to conform the internet industry into the main federal accountability and control which Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 imposed on all businesses of more than 15 employees.

Yet banning discrimination of content or services is just for starters. The government could next require that providers and services not allow “hate speech”—prejudiced discriminatory concepts on the internet. This is the rule in hate law countries where internet servers are forbidden to provide association with “hate groups.” Thus, deviously, Obama’s proposal actually means no right to discriminate against content, i.e. discriminatory “hateful speech and ideas.”

First forbidding you to discriminate against content you find objectionable, the government will eventually force you to discriminate against content it finds objectionable. Net neutrality gives the impression of safeguarding free expression. Actually, it’s a foothold on which the government can exercise jurisdiction to eventually exclude what government, media and society already increasingly agree should be excluded from First Amendment protections: hate speech.

Increasingly, the new generation of Americans, particularly on college campuses, believes that while speech in general should be free, there should be “no tolerance of intolerance.” Federal power to ban “discrimination” by internet providers can lead in only one direction: the power to ban verbal and intellectual “intolerance” on the internet in general. What is intolerance, as defined by the hate crimes agenda of the Obama Democrats? It is primarily judgments which proceed from the Bible, particularly against homosexuality (“homophobia”) and even Jewish complicity in the crucifixion (“anti-Semitism”).

If net neutrality is combined with passage of the federal hate crimes bill plus other hate bills now moving forward in the House and Senate, it will not be long before prejudice, bias and hate crimes will reflexively be associated with “Biblical hate speech” as is now the case in Canada and Great Britain.

If internet providers were sustained with the people’s tax dollars or were a cooperative owned by the people, they might justly be required not to discriminate. What socialism, however, says is that your business that you have created out of your vision, toil and present struggle exists to be enjoyed and dictated to by those who have no part in its actual ownership. Socialism says it is very, very bad for you to hire or fire or discriminate among your patrons as you see necessary. What is really very bad is a government which you support and own which takes control of your property from you, making you a criminal for the exercise of your God-given rights.

Posted by admin, on September 28th, 2009, at 5:02 pm. #.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/darpa-microsoft-lockheed-team-up-to-reinvent-internet.html

Posted by admin, on October 19th, 2009, at 12:23 pm. #.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/high-speed-other-internet-goes-global.html

Posted by admin, on October 19th, 2009, at 12:24 pm. #.

http://www.infowars.com/cia-to-monitor-internet-chatter-for-anti-government-sentiment/#

Posted by admin, on October 20th, 2009, at 7:13 pm. #.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/gchq-outsources-net-snooping-to-eds.html

Posted by admin, on October 22nd, 2009, at 11:46 am. #.

http://www.capital.ro/articol/utilizatorii-europeni-de-net-deconectati-de-provideri-daca-fac-download-ilegal-127146.html

Posted by admin, on October 28th, 2009, at 1:07 pm. #.

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/global-treaty-three-strikes/

Posted by admin, on November 6th, 2009, at 3:02 am. #.

http://antena3.ro/stiri/hightech/legea-privind-deconectarea-internautilor-ce-descarca-ilegal-fisiere-adoptata-de-pe_85878.html

Posted by admin, on November 25th, 2009, at 1:26 pm. #.

http://www.infowars.com/stealth-treaty-seeks-strict-controls-over-internet/

Posted by admin, on December 3rd, 2009, at 1:25 pm. #.

Seful agentiei ONU pentru comunicatii: E nevoie de un tratat de pace pentru a preveni un razboi pe Internet
de A.N. HotNews.ro
Duminică, 31 ianuarie 2010, 17:07 Actualitate | Internaţional

Omenirea are nevoie de un tratat de pace care sa previna ca atacurile informatice sa se transforme intr-un razboi, a declarat seful principalei agentii ONU pentru comunicatie si tehnologie, transmite AFP. Hamadoun Toure, secretarul general al International Telecommunications Union, a facut aceste afirmatii in cadrul Forumului Economic Mondial de la Davos.

Oficialul a propus un acord prin care statele se angajeaza sa nu atace informatic alta tara. “Un razboi informatic ar fi mai rau decat un tsunami, ar fi o catastrofa”, a spus Toure, dand ca exemplu atacul realizat impotriva Estoniei anul trecut. Potrivit declaratiilor sale, acordul ar fi ca un tratat de pace: tarile vor trebui sa garanteze protectia cetatenilor si dreptul acestora de a accesa informatii, vor promite sa nu adaposteasca teroristi cibernetici si “vor trebui sa isi ia angajamentul ca nu se vor ataca una pe cealalta”.

Declaratia lui Toure a fost facuta in contextul discutiilor de la Davos despre atacurile lansate din China impotriva Google.

La randul sau, directorul de cercetare si strategie al Microsoft, Craig Mundie, a spus ca “exista cel putin 10 tari pe glob a caror abilitate online este suficient de sofisticata pentru a lansa atacuri informatice”. “Internetul este cel mai mare centru de comanda si control pentru oricare criminal informatic”, a spus el, adaugand ca Statele Unite, China, Rusia, Israel si Franta sunt printre cele circa 20 de tari angajate intr-o cursa a inarmarilor informatice, pregatindu-se pentru posibile confruntari pe Internet.

Mundie si alti experti au afirmat ca exista o necesitate tot mai mare de a proteja Internetul impotriva fraudelor, a spionajului si a raspandirii de virusi. “Avem nevoie de un fel de Organizatie Mondiala a Sanatatii pentru Internet”, a declarat el.

Mundie a spus ca internautii ar trebui sa aiba un fel de “carnet de sofer”: “daca vrei sa conduci o masina, trebuie sa ai un carnet de sofer care demonstreaza ca esti in stare sa faci asta. Masina trebuie sa treaca o verificare si tu trebuie sa-i faci asigurare”.

http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-international-6861142-seful-agentiei-onu-pentru-comunicatii-nevoie-tratat-pace-pentru-preveni-razboi-internet.htm

Posted by dzp78, on January 31st, 2010, at 7:31 pm. #.