Urban Viorel

MUNIT HAEC ET ALTERA VINCIT

INCREDIBIL !! > Children ‘bad for planet’

  • July
  • 16

2:04 pm Adevarul socant, Atentie !, Bataia de joc!, Dezvaluiri adevarate !, ECO + GREEN BULLSHIT, NESIMTIRE FARA LIMITE, Planeta Puscarie, Realitatea adevarata, Reflectati !, Utile

By Sarah-Kate Templeton in London
The Australian
May 07, 2007 12:00amHAVING large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags, says a report to be published today by a green think tank. The paper by the Optimum Population Trust will say that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their family’s carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York.
John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family planning at University College London, said: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights.

“The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child.”

In his latest comments, the academic says that when couples are planning a family they should be encouraged to think about the environmental consequences.

“The decision to have children should be seen as a very big one and one that should take the environment into account,” he added.

Professor Guillebaud says that, as a general guideline, couples should produce no more than two offspring.

The world’s population is expected to increase by 2.5 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050. Almost all the growth will take place in developing countries.

The population of developed nations is expected to remain unchanged and would have declined but for migration.

The British fertility rate is 1.7. The EU average is 1.5. Despite this, Professor Guillebaud says rich countries should be the most concerned about family size as their children have higher per capita carbon dioxide emissions.

The Sunday Times

++++ alte cautari pe google dupa children bad for planet :

http://www.google.ro/search?hl=ro&q=children+bad+for+planet&meta=&aq=f&oq=

——–

New York Times: Children Bad for Environment

Kate Galbraith
The New York Times
August 7, 2009

Having children is the surest way to send your carbon footprint soaring, according to a new study from statisticians at Oregon State University.

The study found that having a child has an impact that far outweighs that of other energy-saving behaviors.

Take, for example, a hypothetical American woman who switches to a more fuel-efficient car, drives less, recycles, installs more efficient light bulbs, and replaces her refrigerator and windows with energy-saving models. If she had two children, the researchers found, her carbon legacy would eventually rise to nearly 40 times what she had saved by those actions.

“Clearly, the potential savings from reduced reproduction are huge compared to the savings that can be achieved by changes in lifestyle,” the report states.

Read entire article

—–

—————-

Afisari: 336


1 comment

http://www.infowars.com/green-global-government-agenda-becoming-more-evident/

Posted by admin, on July 21st, 2009, at 6:01 pm. #.

Leave a comment!


e-mail (required, but will not be published)


Message

 






© 2007 Urban Viorel.